Subgroups of a Free Group and the Axiom of Choice
نویسنده
چکیده
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
منابع مشابه
On characterizations of the fully rational fuzzy choice functions
In the present paper, we introduce the fuzzy Nehring axiom, fuzzy Sen axiom and weaker form of the weak fuzzycongruence axiom. We establish interrelations between these axioms and their relation with fuzzy Chernoff axiom. Weexpress full rationality of a fuzzy choice function using these axioms along with the fuzzy Chernoff axiom.
متن کاملResults on Engel Fuzzy Subgroups
In the classical group theory there is an open question: Is every torsion free n-Engel group (for n ≥ 4), nilpotent?. To answer the question, Traustason [11] showed that with some additional conditions all 4-Engel groups are locally nilpotent. Here, we gave some partial answer to this question on Engel fuzzy subgroups. We show that if μ is a normal 4-Engel fuzzy subgroup of ...
متن کاملOn Tychonoff's type theorem via grills
Let ${X_{alpha}:alphainLambda}$ be a collection of topological spaces, and $mathcal {G}_{alpha}$ be a grill on $X_{alpha}$ for each $alphainLambda$. We consider Tychonoffrq{}s type Theorem for $X=prod_{alphainLambda}X_{alpha}$ via the above grills and a natural grill on $X$ related to these grills, and present a simple proof to this theorem. This immediately yields the classical theorem...
متن کاملThe Existence of Level Sets in a Free Group Implies the Axiom of Choice
Since all known proofs of the NIELSEN-SCHREIER theorem (every subgroup of a free group is free, henceforth denoted by (NS)) make use of the axiom of choice (AC) it is reasonable to conjecture that some form of (AC) is necessary to prove (NS). (See [ l ] , [3], [5] and [S] for several proofs of (NS).) This conjecture was verified by LAUCHLI in [4], where it was shown that the negation of (NS) is...
متن کاملThe Axiom of Choice for Well-Ordered Families and for Familes of Well-Orderable Sets
We show that it is not possible to construct a Fraenkel-Mostowski model in which the axiom of choice for well ordered families of sets and the axiom of choice for sets for well orderable sets are both true, but the axiom of choice is false. We are concerned with the following two consequences of the axiom of choice: C(WO,∞): Every well ordered collection of sets has a choice function. C(∞,WO): ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Symb. Log.
دوره 50 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1985